Recent reports have reignited discussions about the environmental and social accountability of the mining company Boliden, in Arica, Chile. The company shipped toxic waste from Sweden to the region during the 1980s and had an agreement to process them properly by the Chilean company Promel.
Yet, things didn’t go as planned. Boliden stated that “Upon completion of the final delivery of smelter sludge during 1985, the contacts between Boliden and Promel ceased. Much later on, Boliden learned that Promel subsequently had ceased processing the smelter sludge…”.
As a result, Boliden faced allegations (Aftonbladet and other sources) to be accountable for left long-term environmental and health consequences, including contaminated lands and serious illnesses among local residents.
The debate underscores the ongoing challenges of corporate responsibility in addressing past actions while operating within frameworks for sustainable practices. Boliden has previously maintained that their actions complied with regulations at the time, but others have criticized potential inadequacies in waste disposal practices and a lack of accountability in mitigating harm (source).
Despite the ongoing debate, progress towards the removal of the toxic waste is now being made. Recently the governments of Sweden and Chile announced that they had signed a declaration of intent to collaborate in the removal of the mining waste. (source)
Lessons for Businesses Navigating Climate Commitments
This case provides an important reminder for organizations about the accountability of historical actions of companies, as well as the necessity of embedding sustainability deeply into their operations:
- Transparency and Accountability: Companies must ensure clear, open communication about their environmental impacts, particularly in regions where regulations may vary.
- Proactive Measures: Beyond compliance, businesses should actively assess and address the risks posed to local communities, integrating long-term sustainability into project planning. When engaging another company, it doesn’t mean the measurement stops there. The company should be monitoring the process proactively until results are fully delivered and in some cases be assessed also by authorised third parties.
- Accountability doesn’t expire: Although (in some cases) the company is not the only one who owns the past mistake, working proactively to solve issues their past actions might be causing is still vital for long-term accountability and reputation.
- Learning from History: Cases like Boliden’s demonstrate the lasting impacts of environmental mismanagement, reinforcing the need for systemic approaches to prevent future issues.
Moving Forward
For businesses striving to align with global net-zero and sustainability goals, this case highlights the importance of investing in robust environmental practices. While it may not undo the past, adopting a long-lasting approach can mitigate future risks and build trust with stakeholders.
Such principles align with Lalaimpact’s mission to empower companies in achieving their climate targets responsibly. Let’s continue to champion meaningful change, ensuring the mistakes of the past shape a more sustainable future.
What lessons do you believe businesses should draw from cases like this?